<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Sqs on security ?!</title><link>https://adicpnn.com/tags/sqs/</link><description>Recent content in Sqs on security ?!</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://adicpnn.com/tags/sqs/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Cloudfoxable - Middle</title><link>https://adicpnn.com/blog/cloudfoxable/middle/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://adicpnn.com/blog/cloudfoxable/middle/</guid><description>&lt;!-- raw HTML omitted --&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here we have another case of blurred lines. A vulnerability that anyone in the world can exploit, except not really. To successfully exploit it, you need to know some key information, which makes it fall in the &amp;ldquo;Assumed breach: Malicious/Compromised user&amp;rdquo; category as well.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So really the refined statement is: &amp;ldquo;Anyone in the world can exploit this provided they at some point had/have internal knowledge of the environment&amp;rdquo;. This means someone who used to work at Cloudfoxable Corp could exploit this, or even someone who currently works there but wants to keep their actions anonymous.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>